Fantasy sports pundits have been bashing the hell out of closers, telling people not to draft them early.
Yet people keep drafting them early.
Rather than assume that most fantasy baseball players are crazy, my instinct as an economist is to assume that people are actually rational and that all of the sports pundits are wrong.
So why are people drafting closers early? I’m going to begin by assuming that the draft position is an accurate measure of value and then try to explain why each is valued that way.
Tier 1:
Jonathan Papelbon 38.7
J.J. Putz 46.3
Francisco Rodriguez 53
Joe Nathan 56.8
This group has 3 qualities; high performance, no injury history, good teams (lot’s of save opportunities/less likely to be traded at the deadline)
Tier 2a:
Takashi Saito 63.9
Billy Wagner 72.2
Mariano Rivera 78.2
Francisco Cordero 88.6
Huston Street 103.1
Trevor Hoffman 106.3
Jason Isringhausen 121.3
Tier 2b:
Jose Valverde 81.4
Bobby Jenks 87.8
Manny Corpas 117.3
Chad Cordero 125.4
Rafael Soriano 122.7
Matt Capps 122.8
These two groups are about the same value–all are solid closers and all have some risk. Tier 2a is very old and is potentially an injury/effectiveness risk, mostly on the injury side. They are high-risk high-return players because they’ll either be worth how they’ve done historically or there will be a catastrophic drop-off. Tier 2b is a group with good closers but with a small track record. Again, the question isn’t performance, it’s injury/effectiveness risk–this time the concern is on the effectiveness side.
Tier 3:
Joe Borowski 143.5
Todd Jones 136.8
Joakim Soria 146.8
Brad Lidge 147.6
Kevin Gregg 157.7
Eric Gagne 165.5
These guys are bad. Veeeery bad. They close and that’s why they’re worth anything. By the end of the season, half of them will be worthless (not closing).
Tier 4:
Carlos Marmol 165.5
Jeremy Accardo 165.6
Brandon Lyon 173.3
Brian Wilson 173.8
B.J. Ryan 176.7
Troy Percival 192.5
Some of these guys fall into the ‘bad’ category but also have a risk of not starting the season as closer. Others are effective but have a lower probability of closing.
Ok, so why is the top tier so good? The way I like to look at saves is as a portfolio. Say I want to get 100 saves over the course of a season. If I get one of the players from tier 1, I have 40 down with almost no risk (1/10 chance of some sort of injury/ineffectiveness meaning they’d be worth nothing), plus a bonus to your other categories. Tier 2, I get 30-40 saves, but with about a 1/5 chance of nothing. Tier 3 is about 30 saves with a 1/4 chance of nothing but they hurt your era and whip. Tier 4 is about 30 saves with a 2/3 chance of nothing. If you assume this is correct, the expected number of saves is something more like 36 | 30 | 22 | 20. Do you really want to risk 5 draft picks on tier 4 players who will give you bad peripherals, or would you rather have maybe 1 tier 1, 1 tier 3, and then troll the waiver wire for some more saves? That is a much less risky strategy and is potentially much healthier for your pitching peripherals. Yes you have to eat a 5-6th round draft pick, but the same could be said for players like hunter pence or matt kemp. There are guys like that every year off the waiver wire.
What you’re paying for is to avoid risk. I always try to get two tier 2 closers and then as many tier 4 as I can. The risk you face is very low in terms of the number of saves you’ll get over the course of the season and to have one category locked up like that is very handy.
Posted by larsonwd
Posted by Steve
Posted by larsonwd